Blog Home

«
»

BLOG: Health Wonk Review #24



January 25th, 2007

It’s Health Wonk Review week! Oh, and the State of the Union was delivered, too. Even though the deadline for entries to this edition of the best of health policy blogging was 9 am the morning after, many bloggers were already debating the president’s foray into health reform.

The President’s plan. Robert Laszewski on the new Health Care Policy and Marketplace blog does a thoughtful job setting the President’s health reform proposal in context of the rash of reform plans. On the President’s plan, he writes: “The Bush plan (a regrettable label) is based on an old and generally discredited idea: the old health insurance “tax cap” proposed by Alain Enthoven circa 1979. But instead of merely a cap, the new plan will also give a standard tax deduction to everybody – employer or individual coverage – based on how much they are paying for health insurance. This cap might phase out quickly, but in the short run it seems a good idea.” And it may even work politically, says Laszewski.

Other bloggers beg to differ.  Leif Wellington Haase of The Century Foundation group blog “Taking Note” pronounces the proposal “dead on arrival” and says it’s “bold enough to antagonize potential allies but not bold enough to make substantial changes.” Michael Cannon over on Cato at Liberty praises the “damn fine health care plan” for its proposal to limit the current tax break on employer-provided health insurance, a source of inefficiency that economists have been decrying for decades. However, Merrill Goozner of GoozNews says that limiting this tax break will provide a “powerful incentive” for wealthier (and healthier) Americans to abandon employer-based insurance.

More reform plans. States are in a reforming mood as well. Cannon looks at why an individual mandate (requirement for individuals to purchase health care coverage) won’t solve the free rider problem. The mandate is part of Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s California plan.

Wisconsin has a universal health insurance proposal that Jason Shafrin of the Healthcare Economist applauds for its truly universal coverage with no means testing and some measure of consumer choice.

Emily DeVoto of The Antidote covers the American College of Physician’s proposal which emphasizes patient-centered care.

On Insureblog, Bob Vineyard and Henry Stern explain their “less than enthusiastic support” of community rating—a feature of Sen. Ron Wyden’s Healthy Americans Act and other health reform plans. They argue the mechanism spurs adverse selection, increases insurance rates, and lowers availability of coverage.

Controlling costs. With a looming fiscal crisis for Social Security and Medicare, Health Blawg’s David Harlow clarifies why the Medicare “soft trigger” aimed at cutting spending won’t work.

Here on the Health Affairs Blog, guest contributor Jeff Goldsmith questions the feasibility of a new proposal by Dartmouth’s Elliott Fisher and colleagues to have hospitals and the surrounding community doctors work together to limit costs. Goldsmith also gets into Medicare’s Sustainable Growth Rate, which he says “has become the health policy equivalent of an inflamed hemorrhoid, requiring the annual application of anesthetic and emollients.”

Intermountain’s Brent James discusses a partnership project with Mayo Clinic and Dartmouth to collect data on the “true necessary” cost to deliver care for key conditions. His wide-ranging interview with Matthew Holt on The Health Care Blog tops 11,000 words and has many interesting nuggets on costs, practice variations, and quality. (And I thought Health Affairs Blog had some long posts!)

Pharma news. At Managed Care Matters, Joe Paduda decries the lack of intellectual honesty and rigor in the Manhattan Institute’s new analysis of drug price negotiation.

Over on Drug Channels, Adam Fein critiques the new Bipartisan Drug Importation Legislation, saying it’s a big win for counterfeiters and politicians, but a big loss for the U.S. drug supply chain.

Merrill Goozner, in his role at the Center for Science in the Public Interest, organized a letter of protest concerning the conflict of interest in a planned National Institutes of Health practice guideline meeting on neonatal herpes where most of the featured speakers had ties to the pharmaceutical companies who make treatments for the disease. The meeting was cancelled, and Merrill blogged about it on GoozNews. Roy Poses, also a letter signee, writes about the thorny issue of guideline development on Health Care Renewal.

Insurers. BCBS of Massachusetts is now offering employers a plan design where smokers would pay a higher contribution toward their insurance premium, David Williams notes on his Health Business Blog. Where will this lead, he muses?

Fear of higher out-of-pocket costs are a significant reason why few employees choose consumer-driven health plans, according to new research by the Center for Studying Health System Change. Fard Johnmar on Envisioning 2.0 says insurers need to communicate better with consumers about these plans.

Julie Ferguson, on Workers Comp Insider, highlights the policy issues arising for insurers with some 10,000 private contractors deployed to Iraq.

Home stretch. A few final posts on some diverse topics:

–On Point of Law the American Enterprise Institute’s Ted Frank is not convinced that the paper by Harvard’s David Studdert and colleagues in the new Jan/Feb Health Affairs adds to the debate surrounding the “Sorry Works” idea, whereby disclosure of medical injury to patients along with an apology will help to lower malpractice costs.

–How important is behavioral and mental health to the nation’s economy? Jon Schnaars looks at a variety of news reports on the topic on the Anxiety, Addiction and Depression Treatments blog.

–And two posts in the category of advice to health care administrators: Rita Schwab of MSSPNexus Blog urges hospitals to run criminal background checks on doctors. The Healthcare IT Guy Shahid Shah warns administrators to not be taken in by health care IT developers looking to pad their resumes rather than offer sound advice.

And that’s all for this round. David Harlow of Health Blawg hosts the Feb 9 Health Wonk Review, with entries due 9 am Feb 8.

Email This Post Email This Post Print This Post Print This Post

10 Trackbacks for “BLOG: Health Wonk Review #24”

  1. Health for a Long Happy Life » BLOG: Health Wonk Review #24
    March 21st, 2007 at 8:42 am
  2. Fetch Blogs » Blog Archive » Heath Wonk Review is up…
    February 6th, 2007 at 2:06 pm
  3. Insurance » Heath Wonk Review is up…
    February 4th, 2007 at 8:01 am
  4. sarahparkin.com » Blog Archive » Health Wonk Review is up
    January 30th, 2007 at 2:40 pm
  5. 24/7 Quote US - Insurance Blog » Blog Archive » HealthWonk Reviews The Bush Health Insurance Reform Speech
    January 25th, 2007 at 3:02 pm
  6. Envisioning 2.0 » Blog Archive » The Health Wonk Review Is Up . . .
    January 25th, 2007 at 1:01 pm
  7. Health Business Blog » Blog Archive » Health Wonk Review is up at Health Affairs
    January 25th, 2007 at 12:29 pm
  8. Healthcare Economist · Health Wonk Review #24 is up
    January 25th, 2007 at 10:56 am
  9. HealthBlawg
    January 25th, 2007 at 10:35 am
  10. InsureBlog
    January 25th, 2007 at 10:33 am

1 Response to “BLOG: Health Wonk Review #24”

  1. Marilyn Katz Says:

    I am a licensed health insurance agent, but am as frustrated with the system as my clients. I also have the same issues they have when trying – as a self employed person – to keep my family’s health protected without having to skip groceries! I don’t enjoy having to give my cliets the option of rediculously high deductibles without doctor and lab copays so that premium payment can fit into their budgets reasonably. Yes, I am explaining reality, but I see that glazed look in their eyes, and I am not insensitive to the fact that my explanations are not satisfying to them. They don’t satisfy me either. They are just reality.

    If you’d like more of the ‘poop’ on health insurance, I’d like to invite you to visit my blog –
    http://www.247quoteus.com/index.php

Leave a Reply

Comment moderation is in use. Please do not submit your comment twice -- it will appear shortly.

Authors: Click here to submit a post.