<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SCHIP POLITICS: Deja Vu All Over Again For Covering Kids?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2007/07/16/schip-politics-deja-vu-all-over-again-for-covering-kids/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2007/07/16/schip-politics-deja-vu-all-over-again-for-covering-kids/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=schip-politics-deja-vu-all-over-again-for-covering-kids</link>
	<description>The Policy Journal of the Health Sphere</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 07:58:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: + Bush to Veto SCHIP Bill. Good! + FreeMarketCure.com</title>
		<link>http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2007/07/16/schip-politics-deja-vu-all-over-again-for-covering-kids/comment-page-1/#comment-6166</link>
		<dc:creator>+ Bush to Veto SCHIP Bill. Good! + FreeMarketCure.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2007/07/16/schip-politics-deja-vu-all-over-again-for-covering-kids/#comment-6166</guid>
		<description>[...] Bush to Veto SCHIP Bill. Good! [July 17, 2007 @ 11:16 am] David Catron Advocates of expanded SCHIP funding have consistently misrepresented the reauthorization debate as a Manichean struggle between good and evil or, somewhat less stridently, an unfortunate clash of ideologies.  In reality, the debate is about preventing the program from being used as a Trojan horse for socialized medicine. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bush to Veto SCHIP Bill. Good! [July 17, 2007 @ 11:16 am] David Catron Advocates of expanded SCHIP funding have consistently misrepresented the reauthorization debate as a Manichean struggle between good and evil or, somewhat less stridently, an unfortunate clash of ideologies.  In reality, the debate is about preventing the program from being used as a Trojan horse for socialized medicine. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Health Care BS &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Bush to Veto Child Health Care Bill. Good!</title>
		<link>http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2007/07/16/schip-politics-deja-vu-all-over-again-for-covering-kids/comment-page-1/#comment-6165</link>
		<dc:creator>Health Care BS &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Bush to Veto Child Health Care Bill. Good!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 14:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2007/07/16/schip-politics-deja-vu-all-over-again-for-covering-kids/#comment-6165</guid>
		<description>[...] Advocates of expanded SCHIP funding have consistently misrepresented the reauthorization debate as a Manichean struggle between good and evil or, somewhat less stridently, an unfortunate clash of ideologies.  In reality, the debate is about preventing the program from being used as a Trojan Horse for socialized medicine. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Advocates of expanded SCHIP funding have consistently misrepresented the reauthorization debate as a Manichean struggle between good and evil or, somewhat less stridently, an unfortunate clash of ideologies.  In reality, the debate is about preventing the program from being used as a Trojan Horse for socialized medicine. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

