Blog Home

«
»

Public Coverage Seen As Most Efficient For Uninsured



June 24th, 2008

Covering low-income people through public programs such as Medicaid and the State Children’s Health Insurance Program, rather than through private health insurance, results in lower per-person medical spending and considerably lower out-of-pocket expenses for consumers. That’s the conclusion of a new study published today on the Health Affairs Web site.

For example, the total annual medical spending required to cover an average low-income uninsured adult with Medicaid for a full year would have been $3,084 in 2005, while covering that person with private health insurance instead would have cost $3,899, or about 26 percent more. More dramatically, if the uninsured person were covered by Medicaid, the annual out-of-pocket expenses for that person – including payments for deductibles, copayments and coinsurance, and noncovered services, but not premiums – would be $109, as compared to $771, or about 600 percent more, under private health insurance.

The study is by Leighton Ku, a professor at George Washington University School of Public Health and Health Services, and Matthew Broaddus, a research analyst at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

Email This Post Email This Post Print This Post Print This Post

2 Trackbacks for “Public Coverage Seen As Most Efficient For Uninsured”

  1. Welcome to Health Wonk Review June 26 Edition | Diario BV
    April 4th, 2009 at 7:47 pm
  2. The Economic Argument for Universal Healthcare : Brazen Careerist - A Career Center for Generation Y
    August 14th, 2008 at 7:35 am

No Responses to “Public Coverage Seen As Most Efficient For Uninsured”

Leave a Reply

Comment moderation is in use. Please do not submit your comment twice -- it will appear shortly.

Authors: Click here to submit a post.