<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Activating Patient-Centric Health Care Reform</title>
	<atom:link href="http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2009/07/01/activating-patient-centric-health-care-reform/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2009/07/01/activating-patient-centric-health-care-reform/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=activating-patient-centric-health-care-reform</link>
	<description>The Policy Journal of the Health Sphere</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 07:58:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Health Affairs Blog -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2009/07/01/activating-patient-centric-health-care-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-30797</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Health Affairs Blog -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 02:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthaffairs.org/blog/?p=1498#comment-30797</guid>
		<description>[...] this page was mentioned by Dale Ann Micalizzi (@justinhope), zorgbeheer (@zorgbeheer), connected-health.org (@connectedhealth), Tim Sturgill (@symtym), Julie (@ogihealth) and others. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this page was mentioned by Dale Ann Micalizzi (@justinhope), zorgbeheer (@zorgbeheer), connected-health.org (@connectedhealth), Tim Sturgill (@symtym), Julie (@ogihealth) and others. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitted by JustinHOPE</title>
		<link>http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2009/07/01/activating-patient-centric-health-care-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-29836</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitted by JustinHOPE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthaffairs.org/blog/?p=1498#comment-29836</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was Twitted by JustinHOPE [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was Twitted by JustinHOPE [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom_Grinley</title>
		<link>http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2009/07/01/activating-patient-centric-health-care-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-27681</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom_Grinley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 11:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthaffairs.org/blog/?p=1498#comment-27681</guid>
		<description>The CCHT platform is missing an essential component- accurately gathering psychological information. It becomes even more important to consider mental health in tandem with physical health when when behavioral change is one of the objectives of the platform.

Mental health issues need to be an essential component of all the ongoing conversations around medical homes, EMRs, wellness plans, etc. Given the comorbity of mental health issues with both physical disease and substance abuse; not addressing these issues as an essential component of any change model dooms that model to failure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The CCHT platform is missing an essential component- accurately gathering psychological information. It becomes even more important to consider mental health in tandem with physical health when when behavioral change is one of the objectives of the platform.</p>
<p>Mental health issues need to be an essential component of all the ongoing conversations around medical homes, EMRs, wellness plans, etc. Given the comorbity of mental health issues with both physical disease and substance abuse; not addressing these issues as an essential component of any change model dooms that model to failure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lschofield.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Health Affairs Blog</title>
		<link>http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2009/07/01/activating-patient-centric-health-care-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-26319</link>
		<dc:creator>lschofield.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Health Affairs Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 14:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthaffairs.org/blog/?p=1498#comment-26319</guid>
		<description>[...] Molly Coye and Joseph Kvedar published a healthcare reform piece on the Health Affairs policy web-log titled &#8220;Activating Patient Centric Health Care Reform&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Molly Coye and Joseph Kvedar published a healthcare reform piece on the Health Affairs policy web-log titled &#8220;Activating Patient Centric Health Care Reform&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raymondcarter2</title>
		<link>http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2009/07/01/activating-patient-centric-health-care-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-26300</link>
		<dc:creator>raymondcarter2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 18:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthaffairs.org/blog/?p=1498#comment-26300</guid>
		<description>Amen!  Coincidentally, the Thought Leader segment in this month&#039;s Medical Home News is about the important and growing use of diagnostic and monitoring technologies by mid-level clinicians and consumers.  I am convinced that medical homes will lead the way in CCHT, including innovative Medicaid and community health center projects, and share your view that this is a critical piece of meaningful health care reform.
Raymond Carter, Editor, Medical Home News</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen!  Coincidentally, the Thought Leader segment in this month&#8217;s Medical Home News is about the important and growing use of diagnostic and monitoring technologies by mid-level clinicians and consumers.  I am convinced that medical homes will lead the way in CCHT, including innovative Medicaid and community health center projects, and share your view that this is a critical piece of meaningful health care reform.<br />
Raymond Carter, Editor, Medical Home News</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveBeller</title>
		<link>http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2009/07/01/activating-patient-centric-health-care-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-26287</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveBeller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 19:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthaffairs.org/blog/?p=1498#comment-26287</guid>
		<description>Excellent post! 

Policy issues aside, from a health IT perspective, I agree that EMR/EHRs alone are grossly insufficient if quality improvement and cost control are our country’s goals. I disagree, however, that the necessary “technologies exist today as the platform for CCHT.” That’s because that has not been enough attention given to patient-centered cognitive support (PCCS), which I contend is essential.

According to a recent report by the National Research Council of the National Academies, PCCS is a computerized process that improves decision making by fostering profound understanding through use of a &quot;virtual patient&quot; model. The PCCS process employs a computerized model of a &quot;virtual patient&quot; that reflects an actual patient. An HIT tool would use this virtual patient to guide the selection and analysis of data.

As I discuss at http://curinghealthcare.blogspot.com/2009/06/meaningful-use-clinical-decision.html, the current crop of health IT tools lack a critical element, i.e., they don’t implement the PCCS process.

Since they do not use the PCCS process, mainstream health IT tools do not (a) help clinicians gain substantially greater understanding of their patients&#039; situations (i.e., their strengths, weaknesses, risks, needs, and options); nor do they (b) enable patients to understand their own situations better. Decision-making suffers as a consequence.

Eliminating the health IT-PCCS gap would enhance understanding and promote better shared decision-making about treatment, prevention, health promotion, and self-maintenance. Because both clinicians and patients would be better informed through the PCCS process, the decisions they make would be more likely result in better outcomes (higher quality and safety) at lower cost. This would translate into increased care value (effectiveness and efficiency). In other words, using health IT tools that implement the PCCS process would help realize important benefits to individuals and society. 

As such, PCCS is a necessary ingredient for realizing the benefits of CCHT.

So, we ought not to be satisfied with EHRs alone since they simply cannot take us where we have to go. They ought to be augmented with PCCS if they are to be truly useful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post! </p>
<p>Policy issues aside, from a health IT perspective, I agree that EMR/EHRs alone are grossly insufficient if quality improvement and cost control are our country’s goals. I disagree, however, that the necessary “technologies exist today as the platform for CCHT.” That’s because that has not been enough attention given to patient-centered cognitive support (PCCS), which I contend is essential.</p>
<p>According to a recent report by the National Research Council of the National Academies, PCCS is a computerized process that improves decision making by fostering profound understanding through use of a &#8220;virtual patient&#8221; model. The PCCS process employs a computerized model of a &#8220;virtual patient&#8221; that reflects an actual patient. An HIT tool would use this virtual patient to guide the selection and analysis of data.</p>
<p>As I discuss at <a href="http://curinghealthcare.blogspot.com/2009/06/meaningful-use-clinical-decision.html" rel="nofollow">http://curinghealthcare.blogspot.com/2009/06/meaningful-use-clinical-decision.html</a>, the current crop of health IT tools lack a critical element, i.e., they don’t implement the PCCS process.</p>
<p>Since they do not use the PCCS process, mainstream health IT tools do not (a) help clinicians gain substantially greater understanding of their patients&#8217; situations (i.e., their strengths, weaknesses, risks, needs, and options); nor do they (b) enable patients to understand their own situations better. Decision-making suffers as a consequence.</p>
<p>Eliminating the health IT-PCCS gap would enhance understanding and promote better shared decision-making about treatment, prevention, health promotion, and self-maintenance. Because both clinicians and patients would be better informed through the PCCS process, the decisions they make would be more likely result in better outcomes (higher quality and safety) at lower cost. This would translate into increased care value (effectiveness and efficiency). In other words, using health IT tools that implement the PCCS process would help realize important benefits to individuals and society. </p>
<p>As such, PCCS is a necessary ingredient for realizing the benefits of CCHT.</p>
<p>So, we ought not to be satisfied with EHRs alone since they simply cannot take us where we have to go. They ought to be augmented with PCCS if they are to be truly useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patient-Centric Health Reform &#124; Information Therapy (Ix) Blog</title>
		<link>http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2009/07/01/activating-patient-centric-health-care-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-26286</link>
		<dc:creator>Patient-Centric Health Reform &#124; Information Therapy (Ix) Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 14:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthaffairs.org/blog/?p=1498#comment-26286</guid>
		<description>[...] Technology Center) and Joe Kvedar (Director of Partners&#8217; Center for Connected Health) made a compelling argument for patient-centric health care reform on the Health Affairs Blog yesterday. Coye &amp; Kvedar effectively articulate the rationale and importance of ensuring that our best [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Technology Center) and Joe Kvedar (Director of Partners&#8217; Center for Connected Health) made a compelling argument for patient-centric health care reform on the Health Affairs Blog yesterday. Coye &amp; Kvedar effectively articulate the rationale and importance of ensuring that our best [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

