<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Underneath The Democratic Health Bills Are Republican Roots</title>
	<atom:link href="http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2009/09/23/underneath-the-democratic-health-bills-are-republican-roots/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2009/09/23/underneath-the-democratic-health-bills-are-republican-roots/</link>
	<description>The Policy Journal of the Health Sphere</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 22:23:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: The Rockefeller Republican Health Care Bill - Ross Douthat Blog - NYTimes.com</title>
		<link>http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2009/09/23/underneath-the-democratic-health-bills-are-republican-roots/comment-page-1/#comment-32860</link>
		<dc:creator>The Rockefeller Republican Health Care Bill - Ross Douthat Blog - NYTimes.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthaffairs.org/blog/?p=2214#comment-32860</guid>
		<description>[...] package than as a semi-conservative one. This is a rhetorical tack that progressives often take, and they have a point: The Senate legislation is the kind of bill that the early-1970s Richard [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] package than as a semi-conservative one. This is a rhetorical tack that progressives often take, and they have a point: The Senate legislation is the kind of bill that the early-1970s Richard [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Principles for the Homestretch : HEALTH REFORM WATCH</title>
		<link>http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2009/09/23/underneath-the-democratic-health-bills-are-republican-roots/comment-page-1/#comment-31090</link>
		<dc:creator>Principles for the Homestretch : HEALTH REFORM WATCH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 02:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthaffairs.org/blog/?p=2214#comment-31090</guid>
		<description>[...] assumptions are already baked into leading bills. In the Senate, ostensibly Democratic lawmakers are promoting what are essentially Republican ideas and granting enormous subsidies to industries that may well betray them at the next electoral [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] assumptions are already baked into leading bills. In the Senate, ostensibly Democratic lawmakers are promoting what are essentially Republican ideas and granting enormous subsidies to industries that may well betray them at the next electoral [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Back and Forth They Go Again, and Again, and Again&#8230; &#8211; Blog Watch</title>
		<link>http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2009/09/23/underneath-the-democratic-health-bills-are-republican-roots/comment-page-1/#comment-31015</link>
		<dc:creator>Back and Forth They Go Again, and Again, and Again&#8230; &#8211; Blog Watch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 17:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthaffairs.org/blog/?p=2214#comment-31015</guid>
		<description>[...] Kronebush on the Health Affairs Blog argues that the current crop of Democratic reform bills actually feature &#8220;Republican [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Kronebush on the Health Affairs Blog argues that the current crop of Democratic reform bills actually feature &#8220;Republican [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

