<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Health Reform And Abortion: The Stupak Amendment Hurts Women</title>
	<atom:link href="http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2009/11/16/health-reform-and-abortion-the-stupak-amendment-hurts-women/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2009/11/16/health-reform-and-abortion-the-stupak-amendment-hurts-women/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=health-reform-and-abortion-the-stupak-amendment-hurts-women</link>
	<description>The Policy Journal of the Health Sphere</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 07:58:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: jsehloff</title>
		<link>http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2009/11/16/health-reform-and-abortion-the-stupak-amendment-hurts-women/comment-page-1/#comment-31625</link>
		<dc:creator>jsehloff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthaffairs.org/blog/?p=2897#comment-31625</guid>
		<description>Abortion is a social issue and has nothing to do with healthcare.  Allowing abortion does more to hurt women than the Stupak amendment does.  There is no &quot;choice&quot; for those children that are aborted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Abortion is a social issue and has nothing to do with healthcare.  Allowing abortion does more to hurt women than the Stupak amendment does.  There is no &#8220;choice&#8221; for those children that are aborted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Health Care BS - THE STUPAK PARTY</title>
		<link>http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2009/11/16/health-reform-and-abortion-the-stupak-amendment-hurts-women/comment-page-1/#comment-31580</link>
		<dc:creator>Health Care BS - THE STUPAK PARTY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 04:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthaffairs.org/blog/?p=2897#comment-31580</guid>
		<description>[...] This post at the Health Affairs blog provides little useful information about the Stupak amendment, and less to the reform debate in general, but it does demonstrate how quaint the old feminist clichés have become. It&#8217;s author, Laurie Rubiner, solemnly intones: From the very beginning, a central tenet of health care reform was that no one would lose coverage they already have. That’s why so many women are outraged by the Stupak amendment to the health reform legislation recently passed by the House.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post at the Health Affairs blog provides little useful information about the Stupak amendment, and less to the reform debate in general, but it does demonstrate how quaint the old feminist clichés have become. It&#8217;s author, Laurie Rubiner, solemnly intones: From the very beginning, a central tenet of health care reform was that no one would lose coverage they already have. That’s why so many women are outraged by the Stupak amendment to the health reform legislation recently passed by the House.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

