<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Senate Health Reform Bill: A First Look</title>
	<atom:link href="http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2009/11/19/the-senate-health-reform-bill-a-first-look/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2009/11/19/the-senate-health-reform-bill-a-first-look/</link>
	<description>The Policy Journal of the Health Sphere</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 22:23:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Would the Senate healthcare bill have helped Obama&#8217;s mother? - Allison Kilkenny - Unreported - True/Slant</title>
		<link>http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2009/11/19/the-senate-health-reform-bill-a-first-look/comment-page-1/#comment-31991</link>
		<dc:creator>Would the Senate healthcare bill have helped Obama&#8217;s mother? - Allison Kilkenny - Unreported - True/Slant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 14:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthaffairs.org/blog/?p=2940#comment-31991</guid>
		<description>[...] $5 billion the proposal would appropriate for the program and premiums no longer cover claims. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that this would happen in mid-2011, reports Daniel Esquibel, California Healthline Managing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] $5 billion the proposal would appropriate for the program and premiums no longer cover claims. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that this would happen in mid-2011, reports Daniel Esquibel, California Healthline Managing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Report Shows Health Care Reform Will Lower Cost</title>
		<link>http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2009/11/19/the-senate-health-reform-bill-a-first-look/comment-page-1/#comment-31716</link>
		<dc:creator>New Report Shows Health Care Reform Will Lower Cost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 18:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthaffairs.org/blog/?p=2940#comment-31716</guid>
		<description>[...] Health Affairs, Tim Jost takes a look at what&#8217;s in the Senate&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Health Affairs, Tim Jost takes a look at what&#8217;s in the Senate&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Health Reform Mandates: Senate/Individual &#124; The Incidental Economist</title>
		<link>http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2009/11/19/the-senate-health-reform-bill-a-first-look/comment-page-1/#comment-31586</link>
		<dc:creator>Health Reform Mandates: Senate/Individual &#124; The Incidental Economist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthaffairs.org/blog/?p=2940#comment-31586</guid>
		<description>[...] and Policy Priorities (CBPP)  report by January Angeles and  Judith Solomon, Timothy Jost’s Health Affairs blog post, and CBO&#8217;s analysis of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and Policy Priorities (CBPP)  report by January Angeles and  Judith Solomon, Timothy Jost’s Health Affairs blog post, and CBO&#8217;s analysis of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Health Reform Mandates: Senate/Employer &#124; The Incidental Economist</title>
		<link>http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2009/11/19/the-senate-health-reform-bill-a-first-look/comment-page-1/#comment-31585</link>
		<dc:creator>Health Reform Mandates: Senate/Employer &#124; The Incidental Economist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthaffairs.org/blog/?p=2940#comment-31585</guid>
		<description>[...] This post is on the Senate bill&#8217;s employer mandate. Its individual mandate and mandates in the House bill will be covered in other posts. My sources for this post are the recent Center on Budget and Policy Priorities report by Robert Greenstein and Paul Van De Water and Timothy Jost&#8217;s Health Affairs blog post. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post is on the Senate bill&#8217;s employer mandate. Its individual mandate and mandates in the House bill will be covered in other posts. My sources for this post are the recent Center on Budget and Policy Priorities report by Robert Greenstein and Paul Van De Water and Timothy Jost&#8217;s Health Affairs blog post. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

