<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tax Credits In Federally Facilitated Exchanges Are Consistent With The Affordable Care Act&#8217;s Language And History</title>
	<atom:link href="http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2012/07/18/tax-credits-in-federally-facilitated-exchanges-are-consistent-with-the-affordable-care-acts-language-and-history/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2012/07/18/tax-credits-in-federally-facilitated-exchanges-are-consistent-with-the-affordable-care-acts-language-and-history/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=tax-credits-in-federally-facilitated-exchanges-are-consistent-with-the-affordable-care-acts-language-and-history</link>
	<description>The Policy Journal of the Health Sphere</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 13:10:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: ObamaCare Supporter: Health Law &#34;Rejectionists&#34; Could Skew Interpretation of the Law (By Pointing Out What It Actually Says) - Hit &#38; Run : Reason.com</title>
		<link>http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2012/07/18/tax-credits-in-federally-facilitated-exchanges-are-consistent-with-the-affordable-care-acts-language-and-history/comment-page-1/#comment-292460</link>
		<dc:creator>ObamaCare Supporter: Health Law &#34;Rejectionists&#34; Could Skew Interpretation of the Law (By Pointing Out What It Actually Says) - Hit &#38; Run : Reason.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 14:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthaffairs.org/blog/?p=21337#comment-292460</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] for insurance only in states that complied with federal requirements…” (More recently, Jost has  argued that the clear language of the law should be ignored because it must be a mistake. But his earlier [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for insurance only in states that complied with federal requirements…” (More recently, Jost has  argued that the clear language of the law should be ignored because it must be a mistake. But his earlier [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Health exchanges, with a side of legalese &#124; project millennial</title>
		<link>http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2012/07/18/tax-credits-in-federally-facilitated-exchanges-are-consistent-with-the-affordable-care-acts-language-and-history/comment-page-1/#comment-265523</link>
		<dc:creator>Health exchanges, with a side of legalese &#124; project millennial</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 05:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthaffairs.org/blog/?p=21337#comment-265523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] a well-highlighted health law casebook—so I don&#8217;t pretend to have the answers. I find the Jost and Bagenstos rebuttals compelling (due diligence: Cannon responds to those here and here), but [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a well-highlighted health law casebook—so I don&#8217;t pretend to have the answers. I find the Jost and Bagenstos rebuttals compelling (due diligence: Cannon responds to those here and here), but [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Oklahoma&#8217;s Lawsuit Probably Isn&#8217;t the Silver Bullet for ObamaCare &#124; Barnes for Missouri</title>
		<link>http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2012/07/18/tax-credits-in-federally-facilitated-exchanges-are-consistent-with-the-affordable-care-acts-language-and-history/comment-page-1/#comment-248247</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Oklahoma&#8217;s Lawsuit Probably Isn&#8217;t the Silver Bullet for ObamaCare &#124; Barnes for Missouri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 06:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthaffairs.org/blog/?p=21337#comment-248247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] case here, arguing there is no statutory authority. Law professor Timothy Jost responds here, arguing there is statutory [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] case here, arguing there is no statutory authority. Law professor Timothy Jost responds here, arguing there is statutory [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Legal Crusade to Undermine Obamacare—and Rewrite History &#124; The Insurance Blog</title>
		<link>http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2012/07/18/tax-credits-in-federally-facilitated-exchanges-are-consistent-with-the-affordable-care-acts-language-and-history/comment-page-1/#comment-243873</link>
		<dc:creator>The Legal Crusade to Undermine Obamacare—and Rewrite History &#124; The Insurance Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 16:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthaffairs.org/blog/?p=21337#comment-243873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] his recollection of the legislative history, as related in a blog post for the policy journal Health Affairs: Throughout the debate, Senators assumed that tax credits would be available in all 50 states. Thus [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] his recollection of the legislative history, as related in a blog post for the policy journal Health Affairs: Throughout the debate, Senators assumed that tax credits would be available in all 50 states. Thus [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Analysis: Health Exchanges And The Litigation Landscape &#124; Health Care</title>
		<link>http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2012/07/18/tax-credits-in-federally-facilitated-exchanges-are-consistent-with-the-affordable-care-acts-language-and-history/comment-page-1/#comment-242316</link>
		<dc:creator>Analysis: Health Exchanges And The Litigation Landscape &#124; Health Care</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 13:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthaffairs.org/blog/?p=21337#comment-242316</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] that premium tax credits would be available through both federal and state exchanges,&#8221; wrote Timothy Jost, of the Washington and Lee University School of Law, in the Health Affairs [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that premium tax credits would be available through both federal and state exchanges,&#8221; wrote Timothy Jost, of the Washington and Lee University School of Law, in the Health Affairs [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Free Condoms &#38; Lollipops &#124; Analysis: Health Exchanges And The Litigation Landscape</title>
		<link>http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2012/07/18/tax-credits-in-federally-facilitated-exchanges-are-consistent-with-the-affordable-care-acts-language-and-history/comment-page-1/#comment-242205</link>
		<dc:creator>Free Condoms &#38; Lollipops &#124; Analysis: Health Exchanges And The Litigation Landscape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 09:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthaffairs.org/blog/?p=21337#comment-242205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] that premium tax credits would be available through both federal and state exchanges,&#8221; wrote Timothy Jost, of the Washington and Lee University School of Law, in the Health Affairs [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that premium tax credits would be available through both federal and state exchanges,&#8221; wrote Timothy Jost, of the Washington and Lee University School of Law, in the Health Affairs [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OH: Step 2 — Sue IRS over Obamacare rule &#124; WatchdogWire - Ohio</title>
		<link>http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2012/07/18/tax-credits-in-federally-facilitated-exchanges-are-consistent-with-the-affordable-care-acts-language-and-history/comment-page-1/#comment-240910</link>
		<dc:creator>OH: Step 2 — Sue IRS over Obamacare rule &#124; WatchdogWire - Ohio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 18:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthaffairs.org/blog/?p=21337#comment-240910</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Timothy Jost, a professor at the Washington and Lee University School of Law, for example, writes that the “only viable challengers to the law are employers who may in the future have to pay an exaction because they fail to offer their employees insurance.” [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Timothy Jost, a professor at the Washington and Lee University School of Law, for example, writes that the “only viable challengers to the law are employers who may in the future have to pay an exaction because they fail to offer their employees insurance.” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OH: Step 2 — Sue IRS over Obamacare rule &#171; Watchdog News</title>
		<link>http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2012/07/18/tax-credits-in-federally-facilitated-exchanges-are-consistent-with-the-affordable-care-acts-language-and-history/comment-page-1/#comment-239053</link>
		<dc:creator>OH: Step 2 — Sue IRS over Obamacare rule &#171; Watchdog News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 23:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthaffairs.org/blog/?p=21337#comment-239053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Timothy Jost, a professor at the Washington and Lee University School of Law, for example, writes that the “only viable challengers to the law are employers who may in the future have to pay an exaction because they fail to offer their employees insurance.” [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Timothy Jost, a professor at the Washington and Lee University School of Law, for example, writes that the “only viable challengers to the law are employers who may in the future have to pay an exaction because they fail to offer their employees insurance.” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Capitol Hill Briefing: &#8220;Could Oklahoma&#8217;s New Lawsuit Strike a Fatal Blow to Obamacare?&#8221; &#124; October 17 @ 12:00 pm</title>
		<link>http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2012/07/18/tax-credits-in-federally-facilitated-exchanges-are-consistent-with-the-affordable-care-acts-language-and-history/comment-page-1/#comment-226371</link>
		<dc:creator>Capitol Hill Briefing: &#8220;Could Oklahoma&#8217;s New Lawsuit Strike a Fatal Blow to Obamacare?&#8221; &#124; October 17 @ 12:00 pm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 14:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthaffairs.org/blog/?p=21337#comment-226371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] IRS rule that imposes those illegal taxes. Supporters and opponents agree the PPACA&#8217;s &#8220;entire structure&#8221; depends on the IRS&#8217;s interpretation of the statute, and that this dispute &#8220;could [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] IRS rule that imposes those illegal taxes. Supporters and opponents agree the PPACA&#8217;s &#8220;entire structure&#8221; depends on the IRS&#8217;s interpretation of the statute, and that this dispute &#8220;could [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Must read regarding Health Care Reform! &#124; Conover Consulting</title>
		<link>http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2012/07/18/tax-credits-in-federally-facilitated-exchanges-are-consistent-with-the-affordable-care-acts-language-and-history/comment-page-1/#comment-226078</link>
		<dc:creator>Must read regarding Health Care Reform! &#124; Conover Consulting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 13:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthaffairs.org/blog/?p=21337#comment-226078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Supporters of the law see such legal attacks as proof of the fanaticism of the opposition. Jost is now the leading defender of the IRS’s action. “What is it about extending the benefits of our health-care system to millions of uninsured Americans that so troubles opponents?” he asks. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Supporters of the law see such legal attacks as proof of the fanaticism of the opposition. Jost is now the leading defender of the IRS’s action. “What is it about extending the benefits of our health-care system to millions of uninsured Americans that so troubles opponents?” he asks. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
