Blog Home

«
»

Mixed Financial Incentives for Hospitals to Reduce Surgical Complications’ Frequency



October 17th, 2012
by Chris Fleming

Surgical complications are something that neither patients nor hospitals want. With low complication rates being increasingly recognized as an important measure of good hospital performance, initiatives to lower complication rates are being pursued with the expectation of helping patients and reducing payers’ reimbursement expenses and providers’ costs.

A Health Affairs Web First study released today reexamines the business case for hospitals’ embracing surgical complication programs. Using data on costs and reimbursements compiled by researchers at the University of Michigan and adjusting them to 2010 dollars, Daniel Krupka of Twin Peaks Group and coauthors find that a hospital would suffer a negative cash flow if its surgical inpatient load is not growing. For a hospital performing 10,000 inpatient surgeries per year, annual cash flow could drop by more than $1 million for each 1 percent drop in the complication rate.

Because reducing complications creates bed capacity, hospitals growing fast enough to fill the “empty” beds could experience cash flow growth comparable in magnitude to the loss suffered if they were not growing. The authors conclude by recommending that “hospitals with limited growth prospects that are nonetheless contemplating a surgical complication reduction program establish agreements with payers to share in any savings generated by the program.”

Email This Post Email This Post Print This Post Print This Post

Don't miss the insightful policy recommendations and thought-provoking research findings published in Health Affairs.

No Trackbacks for “Mixed Financial Incentives for Hospitals to Reduce Surgical Complications’ Frequency”

1 Response to “Mixed Financial Incentives for Hospitals to Reduce Surgical Complications’ Frequency”

  1. TARAMACLINRN Says:

    Before the new shift towards pay for performance, outstanding performance should have bee a standard of care. Patients usually equate surgery with correcting problems, not causing them. Surgical complications are the cause of delayed recovery time, increased length of stays, and increased stress levels among patients and caregivers. These should all be reasons to ensure hospitals reduce their surgical complications. I understand that finances play a major part in healthcare but what about patients? We could not provide healthcare without having someone to care for. The patients safety, satisfaction and positive outcomes should be considered before finicial gains.

Leave a Reply

Comment moderation is in use. Please do not submit your comment twice -- it will appear shortly.

Authors: Click here to submit a post.